Thursday, March 19, 2015

Sound Recording Overview

Sound recordings (mainly music)

HISTORY

. Thomas Edison invents phonograph in 1877 (records on metal cylinder format); earliest
uses thought to be for dictation and other business needs

. Emile Berliner patents gramophone; makes spiral track recordings on flat disc

. nickelodeons: 1890s amusement arcade device that plays back a two-minute recording
for five cents; immensely popular. Demand for “entertainment cylinders” grows

Rivalry

Berliner premiers the Victrola in 1906, the first disc player designed to look like the furniture. He forms the Victor Talking Machine Company (the trademark is the famous picture of a dog peering into the bell of a gramophone with the logo, “His Master’s Voice”). The superiority of his device essentially ends the intense business rivalry going on in the recording industry between him, Edison, and the Columbia Phonograph Company.

Early popular recorded music included sentimental favorites, ragtime, jazz, and film musicals. By 1914 record players and record collections become a household standard, encouraged by a national dance craze that lasts through the World War I years. The boom continued into the 1920s with the dawn of the Jazz Age, the blues and jazz music foundation for the Roaring Twenties era.

The Impact of Radio on the Recording Industry

By 1924 record player sales drop 50 percent from 1923, largely due to the popularity of live music delivered via the new radio medium. Record companies counter in 1926 by introducing electronic recording which much improved sound quality, and the marketing of radio-phonograph combination devices. Audiences soon identify radio as the home of “live” music compared to the “canned” music of records. RCA and Victor merge in 1929 to dominate the radio and recording industry.

The Great Depression

With a hard economy imposing record low profits on the industry, a new coin-operated music device called the juke box helps rescue the industry during the Depression years. Installed in bars, diners, and drugstores, juke boxes help boost record sales nearly 500 percent by 1939.

World War II and After

Shellac, a vital manufacturing ingredient for records, is declared a vital defense commodity by the government during the war, and record making plummets. Adding to industry woes is the American Federation of Musicians' strike, 1942-44, who fear losing jobs from canned music. Capitol records, however, begins novel idea of sending free records to radio stations to promote certain songs; it becomes a practice that soon revolutionizes both mediums.

In 1947 the 3M Company introduces magnetic recording tape (an idea borrowed from wartime Germany) which provides better sound quality, easier editing, reduced costs, and multitrack recording capabilities. In 1948 Columbia Records introduces the 33 1/3 long-playing record (the LP). RCA enters the fray with its 45 rpm record, and the marketing battles of this era soon became known as the "Battle of the Speeds." Soon the 33 1/3 becomes the preferred format for albums, and the 45 remains the choice for single hits; the older 78 rpm format quietly disappears. In the 1950s stereophonic players debut, which quickly double the number of records being sold.

Other events that also help heighten record sales:

. emergence of small independent labels (made possible by lowered manufacturing costs)

. emergence of radio as a promotion device (the "promotion" department now a permanent
fixture in every recording company office )

. the nearly unbreakable new records enabled them to be sent through the mail, thus making
possible the birth of record clubs

. as an emerging TV medium strips radio of its standard formats in the early 1950s, radio
looks to new ways to attract audiences; playing the Top 40 songs becomes one of the most
popular ideas.

The Coming of Rock and Roll

As teenagers in the 1950s began to create their own identifiable, American sub-culture (unique clothes, customized cars, and hair styles), they lack their own brand of music. Rock and roll, with its roots in rhythm and blues, commercial white popular music, country and western, and jazz, quickly fill the void.  Rock and roll owed much of its explosive popularity to new singers such as Elvis Presley, Bill Haley, Buddy Holly, Little Richard, Jerry Lee Lewis, and Chuck Berry, all of whom brought to rock and roll their own unique styles that helps give even more richness to the emerging music genre.

Rock Goes Commercial

For various reasons (some scandalous, some not), all the original rock stars had left the scene by 1959. The radio-recording payola scandals of the period further blemishes an already suspect image of rock and roll. In the early 1960s the industry counters by cleaning up rock's image with a new wave of wholesome, clean-cut American singers: Ricky Nelson, Bobby Vinton, Paul Anka, Connie Francis, Fabian, the Four Seasons, Annette Funicello, and Brenda Lee to name a few.

The British Invasion

In 1964 the Beatles took rock and roll by storm with a sound that was widely recognized as upbeat and innovative. Many other British groups followed, but not all followed the same music style; the Rolling Stones and the Animals, for example, exemplified a new blues-based, harsher, and slightly more aggressive sound. Both styles merged somewhat with two music genres currently coming of age in the United States: folk (with artists such as Bob Dylan, Joan Baez, and Peter, Paul, and Mary) and the Motown sound (with artists such as Diana Ross and the Supremes, and the Jackson Five).

Transitions

Music genres in the late 1960s reflect the social experimentation and cultural transition of the times. Freedom, experimentation, and innovation are in. The group Blood, Sweat, and Tears blend jazz, rock and classical music. The Who record a rock opera, Tommy. By the 1970s rock music becomes synonymous with the counter culture, giving rise to non-mainstream groups who play the brash new heavy metal sounds. Countering heavy metal, a softer rock sound emerges, and a few years later a crossover movement sees both genres merging somewhat with a country western music sound. Often the same top songs are featured on the charts of both rock and country music charts.

Industry Trends 1970-1990s

Profits in the record industry followed several roller coaster trends since the 70s, some of which were due to trends (disco), high profile artists (Michael Jackson), new technologies (CDs), the 80s promotional vehicles of music videos and MTV, and the main stream debut of rap music in the 90s.


RECORDING IN THE DIGITAL AGE

The Impact of Napster

The Napster service gave any Internet user the ability to download digital music files to his or her own computer and convert the files into smaller and computer playable MP3 files. Napster users were not charged for services (at least in Napster’s first incarnation). Once files are on a user’s hard drive, it’s an easy step to “burn” any set of songs or music onto your own custom-made CD. Napster quickly becomes a major threat to the recording industry when users reach the 20 million mark within the first year, each user in theory downloading music files and, supposedly, avoiding paying for the original music in CD form; that trend, of course, also means less money for the artist, the recording industry, and retail outlets.

After a relatively short legal battle (1999-2001), the Recording Industry Association of America, which  represents the major record companies, successfully gets the courts to refrain Napster from further distribution of copyrighted materials.

Since Napster, however, a number of file-sharing sites have emerged and it has become quite simple to download songs without paying for them.

Interestingly, since iTunes (and other pay music download sites) emerged, the trend is for young adults to pay a small fee (usually around $1.00) for songs. In other words, people are illegally downloading LESS today than they were five years ago.


More Diversity

The availability of digital music on the Internet direct to the consumer is yet another example of the trend toward disintermediation.

DEFINING FEATURES OF SOUND RECORDING

• Sound recording is a cultural force, characterizing social groups, defining movements, and setting trends in society and, in turn, helps to shape modern culture.

• Second, sound recording is an international enterprise (five record companies dominate the global market, each company headquartered in a different country).

• Third, the recording business is a unique blend of business and talent.


ORGANIZATION OF THE RECORD INDUSTRY

The recording industry can be divided into four major segments:

. talent
. distribution
. production
. retail

Talent

The talent segment of the industry consists of all the singers, musicians, songwriters, arrangers, and lyricists who hope to make money by recording and selling songs, but the road to success is hard and long. Few make it big. A group's first step is usually to perform for local clubs and events; next, if they survive, they'll take their act on the road to gain experience, money, and a little recognition. Traveling acts play in bars and clubs where the band is little more than a human jukebox providing accompaniment or background music. If the talent is lucky, they might be noticed by an A&R (artist and repertoire) scout from a record label. If so, they might be invited to sign a contract.

Production

At a recording studio the group records an album or a few singles. Audio engineers use elaborate sound-mixing systems to perfect the right sound. When the label releases the group's single or album, promotion, publicity, advertising, merchandising, and packaging expertise start in. Though there are dozens of record labels, five firms dominate the industry: Sony, AOL-Time Warner, Bertelsmann, Universal, and EMI.

Distribution There are five main outlets for music distributors:

. direct retail stores (most of which have gone out of business in the past five years)
. rack jobbers they serve department stores and major discount chains (WalMart, Target, etc.)
. one-stops buy CDs from industry, then resell to CD stores and juke box firms
. direct consumer sales (a.k.a. packagers) sales from TV promotions and record clubs
. online sales the consumer deals directly with an online retailer (iTunes, amazon.com, etc.)


Retail

There are two major trends in the retail music segment: consolidation and online selling. Big music chain stores used to dominate, such as Sam Goody, Media Play, Camelot, but brick-and-mortar retailers faced increasing competition from online retailers such as Amazon.com and iTunes (and the general transition to digital music) and most have closed their doors.

WalMart has done well with its music sales (CDs and its online downloads). Today, most music sold comes from either iTunes or WalMart.


OWNERSHIP IN THE RECODING INDUSTRY

The recording industry is one of the most concentrated of all media industries, with just FOUR companies accounting for more than 87 percent of all sales. In addition, these companies are multinational conglomerates with interests in many different industries.

Here's a list-- courtesy of the AP-- of the top recording companies and a sampling of the artists they represent:

Here's a look at the top record labels, their artists and their U.S. market share as of Oct. 9:
_ UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP: 35.12 percent market share in U.S.
Labels include: Geffen Records, Island Def Jam Music Group, Motown Records, Verve Music Group, Decca Music Group.
Artists include: Gwen Stefani, Elton John, Jimi Hendrix, Kanye West, Shania Twain.
_ SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT INC.: 22.79 percent market share.
Labels include: Arista Records, Columbia Records, Jive Records, RCA Records.
Artists include: Carrie Underwood, Alicia Keys, Usher, Chris Brown, AC/DC, Leona Lewis.
_ WARNER MUSIC GROUP CORP.: 21.12 percent market share.
Labels include: Atlantic Records, Warner Bros. Records.
Artists include Madonna, R.E.M., Green Day, Eric Clapton.
_ EMI GROUP PLC: 8.35 percent market share.**
Labels include: Capitol Records, Virgin, Blue Note.
Artists include: Coldplay, Katy Perry, The Rolling Stones, Lenny Kravitz.
_ ALL OTHERS: 12.61 percent.
Source: Nielsen SoundScan, company Web sites.

**EMI Group PLC is now a subsidiary of Universal Music Group, so its effective market share is 43.47%.


PRODUCING RECORDS

Departments and Staff

There are seven departments within the typical recording company:

. artists and repertoire (A&R) at times industry talent scouts; also administrative duties
. sales and distribution sells products, makes sure inventory gets to targeted markets
. advertising and merchandising aids sales by planning media ad campaigns
. business lawyers, accountants, researchers, financial analysts, secretarial staff
. promotion get releases played on radio stations
. publicity tries to get press coverage and reviews for new performers in trade press
. artist development helps further artist’s career with tours, concerts, and TV appearances

Making a CD

For a new group to win a recording contract, their first step is usually to produce a demonstration tape, or demo, which in turn is generally introduced to a recording studio by a manger or agent. If successful, the third step is to go to the studio to record a master tape. A modern sound studio features full multi-track recording capable of recording up to 48 different tracks.

Today a band doesn’t even have to record a piece at the same time; with multi-track recordings each instrument, person, and effect can be record separately and professionally blended together later. After the recording session, the next step is the mix down, the technically job of mixing down the multiple tracks to a two-track stereo master. A master is then reproduced on disc.


ECONOMICS

Economic Trends

The economic trends of the music industry are illustrated in a separate post. As a rule of thumb, sales reached a peak in 1999 and have gone down ever since (post file-sharing). While profits are still robust, they're no where close to where they used to be. The expected trend is that sales will continue to slide, but that paid digital downloads will continue to rise (the problem is that a paid digital download doesn't generate the same kind of revenue as does the sale of a CD).

Rock Performers: The Bottom Line

In terms of profits for the artists themselves, a new group can expect to make from 9-12 percent royalty from a CD, up to 15 percent for established artists, and perhaps even 20 percent at the superstar level. Royalty rates on singles run about 6 to 9 percent.

Performers generally have two main sources of income: (1) record royalties, and (2) personal appearances. Unfortunately, much of a group’s income can be eaten up by support expenses such as agents, legal help, publicity, and accountants’ fees. Most groups get paid by funds advanced against future royalties, and as a result many groups end where they started—in debt.


FEEDBACK

Feedback in the record industry is measured by Billboard magazine’s weekly ratings of stars, triangles, and bullets. Stars are “mover” titles, bullets go to one million seller singles, and triangles to the two million single sellers. In general, the Billboard’s “Hot-100 Chart is based on two components: exposure and sales.

For sales figures, Billboard measures the top 50 retail sales markets, subjectively choosing the most influential music outlets; about 185 outlets are surveyed weekly.

To measure exposure, Billboard surveys the play lists of about 240 leading radio stations, all of which are weighted by audience reach (bigger audiences count more than smaller markets). As evidence of their symbiotic relationship, radio stations usually monitor Billboard magazine to see which records they ought to be playing. The magazine then combines the two components to forge a final figure, which is reported as that song’s rating. Billboard publishes a chart for almost all popular music formats.   Although sampling numbers may vary, the underlying process remains the same.

Sound-Recording Audiences

Demographic profiles for record audiences are difficult to come by because the recording industry is supported by audience purchases and not by advertising. This means that recording companies concentrate on overall sales figures rather than seeking detailed demographic information about their audiences. What information that does exist centers mainly on estimates of the number and type of playback equipment, CDs, files, etc. in the average household. In terms of music sales, people over 35 now account for more than 60 percent of sales (a 30 percent increase over the past 20 years ), while spending by those 19 and under has decreased from 35 to 15 percent during the same period (which gives us an indication as to how popular file-sharing is among teens).

Overview of the Movie Industry

Movies

HISTORY OF THE MOTION PICTURE

Motion pictures and television are possible because of two quirks of the human perceptual system: the phi phenomenon and persistence of vision. The phi phenomenon refers to what happens when a person sees one light source go out while another one close to the original is illuminated. To our eyes, it looks like the light moves from one place to another. In persistence of vision, our eyes continue to see an image for about 1/10 second after the image has disappeared from view.

The Edison Lab and Other Early Experiments

Thomas Edison and William Dickson developed the first practical motion picture camera and viewing device. Dickson developed the idea of taking many pictures simultaneously by using sprocket-fed film to run past a camera lens. In 1889 the pair developed the Kinetoscope, a viewing device that allowed a single person to see the projected film through a peep hole. Edison erred, however, in thinking that film profits would be made by selling the hardware rather than mass admissions to see the film itself. Edison later recanted and developed a projection version of his machine, in 1896, which he called the Vitascope. Vaudeville theaters soon began showing early “films” in-between acts as novelty features, attractions that proved highly successful for a time.

The Nickelodeons

Public interest was soon rekindled when early filmmakers found that movies could be used to tell a story. Many early films, such as George Melies’ A Trip to the Moon, were shot with stationary cameras, much like having a front row seat at a stage production. Then a few American filmmakers saw the aesthetic potential of mobile camera placement and film editing techniques to make films more lifelike and exciting, among them Edwin Porter’s The Great Train Robbery in which he was the first to use mobile camera placement and cut-away scenes.

Nickelodeons, 50-90 seat theaters that charged a nickel admission sprung up almost overnight to accommodate the new demand for narrative films. To keep audiences returning, films had to be changed often—sometimes daily—to attract repeat customers. The demand for new films soared, and along with new film studios to meet that demand.

Zukor and Griffith

In 1912 Adolph Zukor experimented with the medium by charging audiences $1 to see the four-reel film Queen Elizabeth. His experiment proved that middle class audiences would pay a premium amount to watch long but well made films. Later, D.W. Griffith added to the experiment with his three-hour-long and racially biased 1915 film, Birth of a Nation. In response, two African-American brothers successfully produced and marketed a film aimed at black audiences.

Birth of the MPPC

Trying to bring order to a rapidly expanding industry (and to trim rising legal fees for copyright violations and patent infringements), the leading film and equipment makers banded together, pooled their patents, and formed the Motion Picture Patents Company (MPPC) in order to restrict moviemaking to the nine companies that made up the MPPC. Instead of squelching competition, however, the MPPC actually encouraged it. Annoyed by its repressive and conservative regulations, independent producers began offering films to exhibitors at cheaper rates. Smaller film-makers soon found themselves a new, and quieter, home in Hollywood. By 1917 the MPPC was extinct.

The Star System

Independent film-makers quickly recognized that the public was interested in particular actors and actresses (the MPPC refused to even identify their performers). Promoting these stars, independent studios began to capitalize on the audience drawing power of certain performers, such as Florence Lawrence (perhaps our first star), Theda Bara, Lillian Gish, William S. Hart, Charlie Chaplin(the Tramp), and Mary Pickford (America’s sweetheart). Eventually many of these stars joined together to form their own studio—United Artists. Fan interest in star-featured films soon gave birth to longer movies and cries for more comfortable and elaborate movie theaters than the nickelodeons.

Consolidation and Growth

To insure continued high profits, film producers aggressively branched out into all three divisions of the film industry: production, distribution, and exhibition. Film-makers became distributors as well as chain theater owners, while some theater owners moved toward buying their own film studios. A new practice called block booking helped solidify power as well; under this system distributors told theater owners that they would have to accept a certain number of lower quality films if they wanted to continue receiving the top feature movies. By the end of WW I in 1918, American film-makers controlled 80 percent of the worldwide film market.

The Roaring Twenties

Endorsing the idea that the only way to make money was to spend money, Hollywood soon began spending record amounts on salaries and production costs (a 1500 percent increase from 1914-1924).

Along with new-won fortunes came untamed excesses, and, under growing public pressures, the film industry tried to regulate itself. One direct result was the creation of the Motion Picture Producers and Distributors Association, which successfully averted the imposition of government controls.

The Coming of Sound

Silent films, which had never really been silent thanks to play-along pianos and organs, essentially came to an end in 1927 with the production of Warner Brothers’ The Jazz Singer, starring Al Jolson.

With the advent of sound, voices that didn’t “fit” well with existing film actors ended several silent film careers. Directors now had to contend with sound as a vital element of film making, and the cost of shooting films rose because of the new advantages (and restrictions) that sound imposed.

Not surprisingly, the Depression era economics of the 1930s cut into film profits, and Hollywood responded by introducing the practice of showing double features, two films for the price of one. Studios also began experimenting with Technicolor and animation to help encourage attendance.

The Studio Years

Hollywood’s studio years lasted between 1930-1950, featuring such famous studio names as MGM, 20th Century Fox, RKO, Warner Brothers, Paramount, Universal, Columbia, and United Artists. The studios created hundreds of acres of back-lot movie sets, constructed elaborate sound stages, and built up showy stables of creative talent, carefully groomed for stardom. Since music was easier and cheaper to put on film than dialogue, musical films also became popular at the time. The musical extravaganza emerged as a film genre, the main practitioner being New York dance choreographer Busby Berkeley. The situation comedy, a 1930s film genre that blended romance with light banter and comedy, also became a public favorite. But perhaps the most significant period for motion picture achievement was the time between 1939-1941 with the premier of such all-time film classics as Gone With the Wind, The Wizard of Oz, Stagecoach, and Citizen Kane.

Another development that significantly changed the industry was government’s 1938 suit against them which claimed that Hollywood’s vertical control of film production, distribution, and exhibition constituted a monopoly. In 1948 the courts ordered film-makers to divest themselves of at least one type of holding; most chose to get out of their theater chains, or the exhibition end. The court also stopped block booking, thus depriving the studios of a guaranteed exhibition for all their films.

The Film Industry Reacts to TV

As the new TV medium began cutting into movie profits in the late 1940s, Hollywood tried to fight back in several ways: studios refused to advertise their films on TV, refused to release old films for showing on TV, and they even tried to bar their film stars from appearing on television.

Hollywood also attempted to lure audiences back with technical wizardry, featuring such novelties as 3-D, Cinerama (a film shown using three projectors and a very, very wide screen), the “spectacle” film (noted for its lavish sets, casts of thousands, big name stars, and wide screen effects), musicals, and finally, movies with adult-oriented themes that TV couldn’t match. These attempts to compete did not work. Then, belatedly, Hollywood saw that it was in its best interests to cooperate with TV, and in the late 1950s the studios began supplying programs to network TV and began releasing pre-1948 films.

Realignments: Film in the 1960s and 1970s

Major studios began losing their industry influence, and studios began working closer with television. The continued rise of the independent producer also led a concomitant loss of power by the studios. Contracts with creative talent were terminated, and many artists quickly created their own independent film companies. They were often so successful that by the mid-1960s over 80 percent of all films were made by independent production companies. Many remaining film companies were simply absorbed by larger conglomerates.

In the 1960s film controls loosened, and a switch took place from regulating content to regulating audiences, the later through the Motion Picture Association of America’s G-PG-R-X film codes. That same period saw an even greater blend of Hollywood and television as studios began making movies expressly for television.

Film Industry Trends in the 1970s

. revenues and budgets increased
. advent of blockbuster films
. small-budget film hits that could pay back investors a hundred fold
. an increased use of market research
. continued close ties with TV
. the rating system changes: PG-13 is added, and X replaces NC-17



MOTION PICTURES IN THE DIGITAL AGE

Whatever the timetable, the film industry’s conversion from analog to digital technology will affect films at all levels; this, in turn, will put motion pictures through a significant transition period.

Making Movies

Making digital films (cameras, editing, and special effects) is a technology still relatively young. But digital’s cheaper costs and greater editorial flexibility will certainly hasten its use and development.



DEFINING FEATURES OF MOTION PICTRES

• high production costs along with sizeable marketing and distribution costs (the average marketing cost to a blockbuster film has surpassed $200 million)
• dominated by big conglomerates
• the most expensive mass medium on a per title basis
• film has a strong aesthetic dimension, the one medium most discussed as an art form
• going to the movies continues to be a social experience


ORGANIZATION OF THE FILM INDUSTRY

Production

Films are produced by a variety of organizations and individuals. In 1996 independent producers made more than two-thirds of all films, and four out of the five Oscar nominated films in 1996 were independently produced. Major studios today are generally used mainly for finance and distribution purposes.

Distribution

The industry’s distribution arm is responsible for making multiple copies of a movie, then booking and supplying prints of films to theaters around the world, as well as to TV, DVD, video, and pay-per-view outlets. Distribution people are also responsible for advertising and promoting the film.

Distribution companies are firmly entrenched in the industry for several reasons:

. big studios already have a world-wide studio-to-theater communications network set up
. unlike independents, big studios can offer theaters a steady stream films with big name stars
. distributors also serve as major sources of financial underwriting for independent film-makers

Exhibition

Perhaps the biggest trends in exhibition are the increase in theater screens, now just over 37,000, as well as theater upgrades such as digital surround sound, stadium seating, better sound proofing, and gourmet concession stands. The negative side is that the exhibition industry may have overbuilt a bit too much since several major chains are experiencing thin profit margins.


OWNERSHIP IN THE FILM INDUSTRY

As of 2015, the top six film conglomerates and their studios are:

. The Walt Disney Company (Touchstone and Buena Vista)
. Time Warner (Warner Brothers)
. Viacom (Paramount)
. Sony (Sony Pictures Entertainment)
. Vivendi (Universal)
. News Corporation (20th Century Fox) a Rupert Murdoch enterprise


PRODUCING MOTION PICTURES

Departments

Though differences exist, a typical studio might be organized along these departmental lines:

. distribution
. film production division
. TV production division

Preproduction

There are three distinct phases in moviemaking:

. preproduction
. production
. postproduction

All films begin with an idea, such as a novel or play. The next phase is to write a narrative of the film and then draft/polish the final working script. All the while the producer may try to nail down financing, talent, behind-the-camera personnel (director, cinematographer, film editor, etc.), filming locations, and a general investment interest in making the film.

Production

Production if the actual filming stage of the movie. Shooting even a moderate-budget film can cost $300,000 to $500,000 a day, and the average shooting schedule for a typical film is about 70 days. Each day’s shooting results in an average of less than two minutes of usable film. Most exhibitors favor  films that are about 100 minutes long so that a theater can run through two showings in the same evening.

Postproduction

When the film is complete, the film editor begins the postproduction stage of the film. This includes deciding how long scenes should last, special effects additions, sound editing, and finally the making of the release print of the film. Later, preview audiences fill out special preview cards that indicate their reactions to the film; only fine tuning changes are generally made at this point.


ECONOMICS

Movies are an expensive medium. In the late 1990s, the average film cost $60 million to produce and another $20-25 million to market and promote. Today, the "average" Hollywood produced film costs more than $200 million, with many films costing an ADDITIONAL $200 million to market.


Financial success is a function of U.S. and foreign box office revenue, DVD/video sales, cable fees, broadcast TV rights, airline showings, pay-per-view, hotels, and satellite channels.


Financing Films Finance sources include:

. direct loan from distributor (in return for distribution rights and/or studio equipment rentals)

. pickup distributor agrees to buy finished film for a set price at a later date; meanwhile, the
producer gets a bank loan for production. A third party, a completion guarantor, is brought
in to make sure the loan gets repaid.

. a limited partnership finances the picture through outside investors

. under a joint venture agreement, several film production and distribution companies pool their
resources and agree to finance one or more films

The producer and distributor also agree on how the distributor’s gross receipts from the film will be divided. Since the distributor takes the greatest risks, the distributor is the first to be paid. Finally, the actual film production loans are paid.

Dealing with the Exhibitor

A distributor’s license with an exhibitor sets the terms under which the showing of the film occurs, such as run length (number of days theater must show the film), holdover rights (dates film will be available), and clearance rights (the time that must elapse before film can be shown at a competing theater). A license also specifies how the receipts will be divided between distributor and exhibitor; some of the most common schemes are:

. split percentage: exhibitor splits receipts with distributor according to a pre-agreed formula

. sliding scale: as box-office revenues rise, so does the money exhibitor must pay distributor

. 90-10 deal: exhibitor first subtracts operating expenses, then pays distributor 90 percent while
exhibitor keeps the remaining 10

In terms of other revenue, theaters can make up to 90 percent of their profits from concession sales.

Promoting the Film

The first three days a film opens (usually a weekend) is crucial to its success; films that open poorly seldom do well. Consequently, a good deal of promotion, marketing, and advertising is targeted to getting people into theaters for that opening weekend. Common promotion methods include:

. a pre-opening media promotion and advertising blitz
. using trailers (film clips from the movie) during a theater’s “Coming Attractions” segment
. opening the film simultaneously in every available theater
. engage in a merchandising tie-in with a fast food company
. scheduling a film’s opening during historically prime movie times (big Holiday weekends-- Thanksgiving, Memorial Day, Independence Day, summer breaks (when schools are out), etc.)

FEEDBACK

Box Office

Film industry feedback centers on weekly box-office figures (taken from 1600 theaters in 24 urban markets, which also accounts for about ¼ of the film’s total gross income).

Market Research

Because of rising film costs, market research has become a much more important factor in the film production process. The first step is generally to test promising plot lines, followed by an analysis of the script. That’s followed by issuing a rough cut of the film, which is in turn used for a series of test screenings. Often a focus group (10-15 random members of a target audience) is used to get a detailed analysis of the group’s reactions toward the film.

Motion Picture Audiences

Hollywood puts little faith—or money—into doing audience analysis, preferring instead the bottom line figures of box-office revenues for guidance. But we do know a few things; for example, one out of two audience members are under 30, teenagers account for 30 percent of the audience, and older fans are now more likely to go to a movie than they were five years ago.


Frequent movie goers (they see at least 12 films a year) account for 77 percent of all film admissions. Of these frequent goers, most are single, 16-39, they are more educated, from middle-class families, and they live in urban areas. The audiences for movies are largest in July and August, smallest in May. Worst two weeks of the year for exhibitors: the first two weeks in December.

The number of tickets sold domestically each year appears to have leveled off, with only slight differences over the past 20 years.

For example, the number of tickets expected to be sold in 2015 is 1.26b, and the number sold in 1996 was 1.27b. The difference, of course, is that there are considerably more people today (322m) than in 1996 (269.4m), so the rate has dropped precipitously. Put another way, in 1996 the average person went to just under 5 movies per year; in 2015 that number is less than 4. That's not a positive trend.

Annual Ticket Sales

 199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015
Tickets (billion)1.221.271.421.451.441.391.441.581.551.471.391.411.401.391.421.331.281.391.341.271.26
Revenue ($bn)5.295.596.516.787.307.488.139.189.359.118.939.259.639.9510.6510.4810.1411.0710.9010.3610.53
Note: Figures for 2015 are at an annualized rate.



Through November 1st of 2015, Universal is leading the pack in worldwide revenue:

January 1–November 1, 2015
Overall Gross: $8.960 billion
RankDistributorMarket
Share
Total
Gross*
Movies
Tracked
2015
Movies**
1Universal26.1%$2,340.51917
2Buena Vista16.6%$1,490.8139
3Warner Bros.16.0%$1,437.83422
420th Century Fox11.6%$1,039.21912
5Sony / Columbia7.5%$672.41713
6Paramount6.5%$579.4128
7Lionsgate4.1%$364.92220

The top 7 studios collectively account for nearly 93% of all market share. If one were to include the mini-major studio of The Weinstein Brothers, then the number is nearly 96%. All other film studios combined (and there are hundreds of them) account for only 4% of revenue. 

 

Underbelly of Movie-making, Part 1 of 2

6 Things the Film Industry Doesn’t Want You to Know About

Cinematic Listology By Ashe Cantrell on September 8 |

You may already be a film industry cynic. Maybe you think Hollywood is a barren wasteland, devoid of creativity and originality. Maybe you’re sick of seeing talented people get ignored and vapid hacks get splashed all over the trades. Maybe you’re tired of 3D everything and having to re-buy your movies every five to ten years.
I’m not here to dissuade you of any of that. Hell no, I’m here to make it worse. Get ready, because this is some of the rottenest shit of which the film industry is capable. These are the things so terrible that Hollywood has to cover them up, lest God see their sin and smite them accordingly (and keep various government entities and lawyers off their backs, of course). If you still had any kind thoughts toward Hollywood, I suggest you prepare yourself for crushing disappointment.

But first, I’d like to give a very huge shout out and thank you to writers C. Coville and Maxwell Yezpitelok for their help on this article. You guys are great!

And now back to the shit storm, already in progress:

6. Tricky Hollywood Accounting


Here’s a basic example of Hollywood Accounting: A studio makes a movie. The studio distributes the movie itself, and although the distributor is technically a separate company, they both belong to the same parent company. Also, the distribution arm sets whatever fees it wants. If they want to charge themselves eleventy quintillion dollars for distribution, they totally can. Then, even if the film earns billions of dollars in box office receipts, they’re still technically in debt (to themselves) and thus haven’t turned a profit.

Sound ridiculous? It happens all the freaking time. David Prowse, the guy who was in the Darth Vader costume in the original trilogy of Star Wars (before being ousted by that douche Hayden Christensen in the special edition) has never been paid for Return of the Jedi because it hasn’t turned a profit after nearly 30 years. That’s after dozens of home video and theatrical re-releases. (All the merchandising money goes to Lucas directly, of course.)
Similarly, someone leaked Warner Bros.’ accounting sheet for Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix onto the internet, showing that the film that had grossed about $1 billion worldwide had lost $167 million on paper.
Winston Groom, the writer of Forrest Gump was told that the film based on his work wasn’t profitable. Of course, he got the last laugh when they came to him asking if they could turn the sequel, Gump and Co. into a film as well, and he reportedly told them, ”I cannot, in good conscience, allow money to be wasted on a failure.” In other words, “Go fuck yourself.”

And then there’s Art Buchwald, whose spec script got stolen by Paramount (remember that, it’s going to come up later), and got turned intoComing to America. When he took them to court and sued for a percentage of the profit, Paramount was totally cool with it, because according to their books, it hadn’t made any kind of profit, so they didn’t owe him one red fucking cent. The judge later ruled that it was “unconscionable” for Paramount not to pay Buchwald something in a settlement. Otherwise, he’d have to ask Paramount to open their books for the courts to review. Paramount quickly backed down and settled with Buchwald instead.

5. Extorting Theaters

Ever wondered why popcorn, something that costs $.25 a bag on Planet Earth, costs $7 at the movies? Here’s a hint: it’s not because of the reconstituted pig flesh that they call butter.

Movie theaters have had to look for more and more ways to increase revenue, like jacking up the prices of things at the concessions stand and adding a dozen ads to the beginning of each film. Why, when new releases are constantly breaking records and making obscene amounts of money? Because film studios don’t like the theaters getting their beak wet.

Movie theaters operate on a kind of sliding scale. The first weekend of a movie’s release, the profit is split heavily in the studio’s favor, typically around an 80/20 split. The second weekend, it may change to a 70/30 scale, and so on. It’s even rumored that some major blockbuster films like Avatar are released with 90/10 or even 95/5 splits. Now keep in mind that exceptionally few films do very well after the first week of their release.

So why do the theaters take these awful deals? Because if they don’t, the studio is under no obligation to lease their films to that theater, so they can just totally bounce if they want to. If that happens, the theater has no films to show at all, and then what have they got to draw people in? Overpriced hot dogs?

4. Fake Reviews


Have you ever seen a trailer for a shitty movie on TV and it has one of those blurbs that’s like “…stunning…,” and maybe a soothing voice reads it aloud? You may joke with your friends that the rest of that quote is “a stunning pile of horse shit.” Turns out, that actually happens. It’s not a joke at all. Marketing departments just plain don’t give a fuck. For example, one critic’s review of Live Free or Die Hard got shortened from “hysterically overproduced and surprisingly entertaining” to “hysterically… entertaining.” Sometimes they’ll even take the blurb from parts of the review where the critic was referring to a different movie entirely or the genre as a whole, like when a blurb used for Definitely, Maybeturned out to be from the critic’s description of the romantic comedy genre as a whole and not his actual thoughts on the film.

Another fun trick Hollywood likes to use is trying to woo critics with free screenings, food, set visits, and other goodies. The people who take the bait are called quote whores. If your film needs a good review, they’re there to give it. One of the most infamous is a critic named Earl Dittman, who is the film critic for a publication called Wireless Magazine. You’ve probably never heard of Wireless, and that’s because they apparently have zero subscribers and no web presence, and yet that doesn’t stop film studio marketing departments from using his blurbs like they’re gold. In fact, Dittman was the center of a lot of controversy when an e-mail he sent to Fox contained not one, but ten different blurbs for the movie Robots and instructions for the studio to pick and use whichever one they liked best. But at least Earl Dittman’s a real guy.

David Manning, however, is a different story. In 2000, Sony Pictures created the fictitious Manning and claimed that he worked for The Ridgefield Press, a real newspaper. Unfortunately, they didn’t foresee someone actually asking the paper if they’d ever heard of the guy, because, you know, they hadn’t. All of his blurbs were concocted by Sony Pictures’ marketing department. Fox pulled similar shit, usingfootage of employees pretending to be ordinary movie-goers for promotional material.

In the spirit of Hollywood review tactics, I’m going to build a review of my most recent articles from an e-mail that the Film School Rejects editors sent me.
“Ashe, we’re getting really sick of telling you this, but if you… don’t… keep… posting these ridiculous[ly wonderful]… articles, we’re going to have to let you go.” -Cole Abaius, Film School Rejects


–~~~~~~~~~~~~–

3. Copyright Bullshit


Now, I’m not going to sit here and say that copyright sucks and it should be abolished, because I think it’s a useful tool for creators who want to protect their work from douchebags who might rip it off. What sucks is the way that big film companies use copyright as a bludgeon to keep people away from their intellectual property.
See, originally, copyright was limited to a maximum of 28 years. If you created something, you had 28 years to get all you could out of it, because after that it became public domain. Since those days, copyright terms have been extended numerous times, and each time one company has been leading the charge: Disney.

Each time the copyright on Steamboat Willie is about to run out, Disney loses their shit and lobbies the government to pass another copyright extension law. Although a popular explanation for this is that they’d lose the rights to Mickey Mouse if Steamboat Willie were to become public domain, that’s not the case. Mickey Mouse is actually a trademarked property, and trademarks are perpetual as long as the company continues to use it. (If you haven’t noticed, Disney uses the fuck out of Mickey Mouse.) The simple fact is that Disney still makes lots of  money selling DVDs and merchandise relating to Steamboat Willie.

In fact, Duke University compiled a list of all of the films that could have entered the public domain this year if Disney hadn’t argued for the law to be changed in 1976. Movies like On The Waterfront and Seven Samurai, and even the first two books of The Lord of the Rings would be in the public domain now, free for anyone to use and enjoy and remix and learn from. As it stands now, Steamboat Willie remains under copyright until 2023, and even fairly boring things like the very first issue of Sports Illustrated are protected until 2050. You can imagine what that means for movies that came out this year.

Here’s something funny, though: Some legal experts believe that Steamboat Willie may have never been registered for copyright at all. Nowadays, the very act of creating something gives you copyright, whether you register it or not, but back then, you had to specifically register the copyright for the works you wanted protected, and you had to label it in a very certain way afterward. A Disney researcher,Gregory Brown, believes that Walt Disney may have improperly formatted the copyright notice on Steamboat Willie, thus making the copyright void. In fact, a law student at Arizona State University researched Brown’s claims and agreed with him. Not only that, but a George Washington University copyright expert agreed with both of them and published a paper saying so. It was at this point that Disney took notice of the issue and actually threatened to sue him for “slander of title.” Holy shit, Disney.

2. Strangling Consumer Choice


If you’re like many millions of other Netflix customers, you were probably pissed off when they jacked up their prices last month, effectively doubling the cost of some people’s subscriptions. And before that, you were probably annoyed when they started putting out their DVDs 28 days after they went on sale. And maybe you’re mad now that they’re losing their contract with Starz because they had an argument about money.

It’s almost like Netflix got tired of making money or something. Why do they keep doing all this stupid stuff? Well, simply put, it’s not really their fault. You see, film studios aren’t the biggest fans of things like Netflix, Redbox, or Hulu. You know, those things that allow you to pick and choose what you want to watch when you want to watch it for a reasonable, affordable price. The reason is that it eats into their sales of DVDs and pay-per-view rentals, for which they get a much higher cut of the profit. As DVD sales drop, movie studios panic.

So, instead of adapting their business model to a format that consumers obviously prefer, they’d rather try to turn back the clock and take away the distribution methods people love and enjoy. That means demanding more money from Netflix to lease their movies, ever-increasing delays between a DVD’s release and its availability out of Redbox machines, and putting Hulu, a service created by the content creators themselves, up on the auction block when it ended up being too successful. The Time Warner CEO has even taken to blasting Netflix in the press for the last year, describing them as a “fading star.” You’d fade, too, if someone wrapped their hands around your throat.

1. Stealing Scripts


Remember Art Buchwald from earlier? The guy who almost got screwed by Paramount before a judge stepped in and told them to cut that shit out? Well, there’s a little more to that story. A few years before the big court case, Buchwald was already a successful humor writer and satirist, even winning himself a Pulitzer for his work. Then he set his sights on Hollywood, and he pitched Paramount an idea for a movie about an African prince who moves to America to find a bride. He suggested Eddie Murphy as a lead actor. (That’s right, kids. People used towant Eddie Murphy in their movies.)

Paramount took the pitch, but then had trouble getting it off the ground. Eventually, the rights returned to Buchwald and he pitched it to Warner Bros. Shortly after they began work on it, though, Warner Bros. killed the project. Turns out, there was a similar film going into production at Paramount. It was a movie about an African prince who moves to America to find a bride. Oh, and it starred Eddie Murphy, who was also given writing credit. That movie, of course, was Coming to America. Buchwald was furious and immediately took Paramount to court, which instigated the events discussed back in the Hollywood Accounting entry. So Buchwald didn’t just get screwed, he almost got double-screwed. But he’s not the only one.

Turns out, some of those crazy people who constantly crop up and say Hollywood producers ripped off their scripts aren’t so crazy. In fact, it turns out that it’s a dirty little secret of Hollywood’s that stealing scripts is almost commonplace. Jeff Grosso wrote a script about his life as a professional Texas Hold ‘Em player and had it turned down by Miramax, only for them to turn around and begin production on an identical project that became the Matt Damon film Rounders. Another writer, Reed Martin, pitched his idea and, like Buchwald, even recommended the perfect actor for his script– Bill Murray. Months later, an exceptionally similar movie, Broken Flowers (starring Bill Murray, of course), went into production without Martin. Although Martin’s claim survived many attempts at dismissal, it saw a trial in which a jury sided with the studio. Due to the high cost of the appeals process (an approximated $800,000), he has not filed an appeal.

The problem is that while scripts can be copyrighted, ideas cannot. So, if Hollywood gets pitched an idea and likes it, but doesn’t want to deal with the whole “paying for the script” thing, they can just hire someone to write another script based on “their” idea. Since they have much bigger, meaner lawyers than your average spec script writer, the writer kinda gets boned. So even the mythical “original idea” in Hollywood? Yeah, it may not be so original after all.